THE Q'S OF DOOM (not really) (returns) (you sickass mofo)

[Shiinigami]

To Wiseman's Q - No it doesnt. I have no idea what the answer is, but its 50/50 chance. ^^

[Xellos]

Yes it does!

[mrwiseman]

The answer to my sets question is:

A set cannot be a member of itself. (Bertrand Russell 1902)

[img]tongue.gif[/img]

<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ October 20, 2002 07:39 AM: Message edited by: -Wiseman- ]</font>

[Xellos]

SDamn, my guess failed &gt;&lt;

[Cavalier]

im only gonna hurt myself if i try to find the answer =/

[Shiinigami]

So i got it right?

[mrwiseman]

Well, actually, no such "set of sets that do not contain themselves" is possible.

Let's divide all kinds of sets into:
- Classes of individuals
- Classes of classes of individuals
- Classes of classes of classes of individuals
and so on.

A class cannot be an individual; a class of classes of individuals cannot be a class of individuals, and so on.

It's a bit messy, but basically, this disallows my "set of sets that do not contain themselves".

[Shiinigami]

I see. I totally understood that. ^^uu

[Xellos]

I', totally lost T_T

[Dragonrider]

damn, I was gonna answer that!

:-P

I woulda been on the right track I think (I was gonna answer no) but I see better now. :-)